November 1, 2007

Church websites around Atlanta are pretty bad

Reading Time: 2 minutes

I was trying to contact some large churches in the Atlanta area to see what they were doing to try to conserve water during the current drought. I used a list from 2005 of “Atlanta’s 25 Largest Places of Worship” (paper copy — not available online).

These are BIG churches. The smallest

budget listed was $2.2 million, with the largest being $23.5 million. There is simply no excuse for some of the bad techniques on these sites.

You’ll notice that some churches show up in multiple lists, while about 1/4 of them had no obvious problems. I’ll admit that I didn’t dig very deep into the sites, as I was just trying to find contact info.

On the list, three of them had an intro that I had to choose to skip. That’s always bad practice:


One church tried to disable my right-click.
Not only is that very easy to get around (a simple menu option in Firefox), but it makes the site harder to use. I was looking for contact info, but when I found the e-mail address I wanted, I would have had to type it into gmail instead of copy/paste.

There were quite a few that lost their navigation when JavaScript was disabled. That’s simply inexcusable:

A handful had oversized images on the front of their site — large images that were scaled down using HTML, which results in slow load times and jagged images:

Of the list, only two of them used proper canonicalization (having “site.com” automatically add the www and redirect to “www.site.com”, mostly for search engine purposes). This was especially sad because a lot of them had automatic redirects on the home page to some horrible long URL (“snellvilleumc.org” becomes “http://snellvilleumc.org/templates/cussnellvilleumc/default.asp?id=31612”) and they still didn’t bother to drop in the “www”:

So 23 churches didn’t canonicalize properly. Not a huge deal. Two of them were even worse, though — they don’t load at all without the www!


For the most part, they had pretty bad page titles.

Here’s what I suggest, but there were a lot of “Welcome to blah blah church”. The worst was rumc.com, with the title of “Home Page”. Very useful, thanks.

The last one is an interesting case of multiple URLs. I typed in christtheking-atl.org, which took me to cathedralofchristtheking.org. No problem. Then I noticed that all of the e-mail addresses were “@ctking.com”. I wonder why they don’t redirect there? Turns out that ctking.com doesn’t even load! Very strange.

That’s about it. I could have spent longer digging through all of them, but that took long enough as it was. The other sad thing is that I e-mailed all of these churches over 24 hours ago and I’ve only heard back from three of them. This e-mail is a way to get them favorable coverage on a pretty high-traffic blog (Atlanta Water Shortage), yet most haven’t even bothered to reply.

Have heart, small churches! Big budgets don’t always help.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

Informational keywords don’t help your business

Reading Time: < 1 minuteThe world of search engine optimization has been changing dramatically over the past few years, and you can find many of those changes in my…

Read More

Thrash early, not late

Reading Time: < 1 minuteIn most projects, you need to get a handful of people involved to get their input. The more you can front-load that input, the more…

Read More

Customers are mostly done with their research before they even reach out to you

Reading Time: < 1 minuteIt’s fun to build a website and think about all of the people that will come to your site to do their research about your…

Read More