August 11, 2021

The highest isn’t always the best

maxresdefault
Reading Time: < 1 minute

Last year I shared some data that showed that a rating on Amazon of between 4.2-4.5 stars was generally considered more trustworthy than a product with full five-star reviews. Some bad reviews mixed in (ideally with reasonable responses from the owner) tend to make users trust the great reviews even more.

It reminded me today of a funny part of the show “The Good Place“, where Jason Mendoza shares his scale for rating dancers on a scale of 1-13, with 8 being the highest. Check it out here:

If you’ve watched the show, you know that taking any advice from Jason is likely a bad idea, but I thought this was a fun way to look at reviews.

Not unlike Jason’s idea, Amazon and Google reviews go on a scale from 1-5 with 4.5 being the highest. It’s weird, but generally holds true.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts

There is no reason for anything, only reasons

Reading Time: < 1 minuteIn a recent episode of the 2Bobs podcast, host Blair Enns was talking about how businesses fail. In his view, they never fail for a…

Read More

Last touch attribution will lie to you

Reading Time: 2 minutesIn the world of marketing, “last touch attribution” is very popular. It essentially says that no matter what a potential customer does before they find…

Read More

Good headlines are a courtesy

Reading Time: 2 minutesWith most things related to business, a “yes” is what you’re really going after but a “no” isn’t bad either. Better to hear “no” today…

Read More